A Promised Land

America as a Developing Country

  • Home
  • About
    • This Site
    • Stephen Golub
  • Topics
    • Election 2020
    • International Development
    • Learning From Other Countries
    • Supreme Court
    • Trump
    • U.S. Democracy
    • Women’s Status
  • Subscribe
  • Contact

June 7, 2025

The Manchurian President

What if Putin really did control Trump? And what can we do?

In the 1962 film, “The Manchurian Candidate,” a US soldier is captured during the Korean War and brainwashed in Manchuria (a part of China bordering Korea) by Chinese and Russian agents. They then arrange his supposedly heroic “escape” that earns him the Medal of Honor back in America.

The point of this plan? Acting as an automaton, he will then unwittingly assassinate a presidential candidate and usher in an authoritarian regime serving our enemies’ interests.

Which brings us to Donald Trump. I am not suggesting that he’s been brainwashed or that he deliberately prioritizes the Kremlin over America. His main motivators instead seem to be money, power and narcissism.

But, speaking hypothetically, what  if Trump were in fact a “Manchurian President,” brainwashed  by Russia to  undermine the United States? What would he do?

He would badmouth democracies far more than despots.

He would insult long-time friends such as Canada and Denmark by threatening their territorial integrity.

He would have his vice president back a Russia-friendly neo-Nazi party in Germany.

He would alienate other democratic allies through statements, trade policies and foreign policy decisions that force them to recalibrate their relations with us.

He would purge the U.S. military brass of many officers, including the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, likely to prize fealty to the Constitution over loyalty to him.

He would abandon Ukraine, whose fight against Russia’s brutal aggression is so crucial to European security and democracy that even formerly neutral Sweden and Finland have joined NATO.

He would gut our national security staffing and other parts of the government that protect us against efforts to cripple our security and democracy.

He would appoint incompetents or people sympathetic to hostile powers to top national security positions.

He would take little action when such officials clumsily engage in classified discussions that leak combat plans to outsiders.

He would sabotage American soft power by ravaging foreign aid and sacrificing millions of lives abroad through medical care cuts.

He would attack our democratic institutions right and left, including by condemning judges and extorting law firms and media outlets.

He would assign a fellow narcissist and associated techno-brats to hastily purge the government of expertise, personnel and resources in a matter of weeks.

He would impose massive staff and funding cuts on medical and other research, harming public health in particular and American scientific leadership in general.

He would select individuals with bizarre public health ideas to head agencies charged with protecting the public against pandemics.

He would deregulate a cryptocurrency industry that could run amok even as it enriches him and his allies.

He would push tariff policies that whiplash practically daily and that could hurl the U.S. economy into a tailspin.

He would back budget-busting, billionaire-benefiting legislation that would both damage the economy and deny health care to millions.

He would so undercut America’s financial and defense credibility that the world could lose confidence in the country for decades.

He would seek to block thousands of brilliant foreign students from studying here, ensuring that many of them will instead benefit other nations’ universities, economies and societies.

He would engage in rhetoric that cleaves our country in unprecedented ways, with boasts of retribution and brutal social media blasts against anyone who opposes him.

He would blame our problems on minorities, immigrants and anyone else outside what he sees as the mainstream.

He would pardon insurrectionists who violently tried  to take over the U.S. Capitol and block a presidential election’s certification.

He would pardon other criminals in exchange for financial favors or political loyalty.

He would embark on an unparalleled reign of corruption that wreaks havoc on our rule of law at home and our image abroad.

He would order a $45 million, Soviet-style military parade on June 14, ostensibly to honor the U.S. Army’s 250th anniversary but in reality to celebrate his birthday that day.

He would do all this – and far more – less than 10 percent of the way into his presidency.

He would assume that he can’t and won’t be stopped.

Which brings us to the “No Kings” rallies taking place across the country on June 14. Through such demonstrations, we demonstrate to the media, the world and ourselves that we’re not giving up. By showing up, we’re standing up for democracy.

Comments

  1. Jenny Moore says

    June 7, 2025 at 1:25 pm

    Thanks for your post, Steve! I’ve just shared it with my family. Peace, Jenny

    Reply
  2. Richard Fleming says

    June 7, 2025 at 1:27 pm

    Thank you, Steve. A great accounting of the “accomplishments” of Trump 2.0. He is also dismantling agencies which measure inflation and trade imbalances, and eliminating agencies which protect the public from harmful chemicals and infectious diseases. He is making truth and facts optional.

    Interestingly, my brother-in-law asked Musk’s AI app two months ago if Trump was a Russian asset. The app said there was an 85% chance he was an unwitting Russian asset, and a 45% chance he was a conscious Russian asset. A lot of back-up information was provided to support these calculations. Of course, after Musk was made aware of his app providing such an assessment, he “fixed” the app so it would no longer give that answer.

    Reply
    • Stephen Golub says

      June 7, 2025 at 2:03 pm

      Thanks, Richard. The list of items I left out could well be longer than those I included.

      Interesting though not surprising that Musk’s AI app indicated damining results about Trump, but then was scrubbed of that information. I wonder whether he’ll restore it if their battle escalates.

      Reply
  3. Beverly Mire says

    June 8, 2025 at 8:11 am

    Hi Steve, Thanks for this. Thanks also for mentioning June 14.

    Beverly

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Richard Fleming Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

The Manchurian President

Down But Not Under: In “No Worries” Australia, Worries About America

Ten Positive Points About American Democracy and What the World Can Teach Us

Featured Posts

Empty Sky

Seeing the Light and Springsteen

In the Name of Love: MLK Day Matters More Than Ever at Home and Abroad

About A Promised Land

A Promised Land explores the enduring grind of U.S. politics, fresh takes on policy debates and the long-term promise of viewing America as a developing country. Its perspective partly flows from Stephen Golub’s many years of international development work with leading aid agencies, foundations, policy institutes and advocacy groups.

More About This Site
More About Stephen Golub

Search

Archives

  • June 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • January 2023
  • November 2022
  • June 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020

Copyright © 2025 A Promised Land   -   Site Developed By Flying Seal Systems  -  Privacy Policy